Novel rectangular‐to‐circular waveguide mode converter based on using one‐step double‐cruciform waveguide for millimetre‐wave applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A novel design for a TE 10 ‐mode rectangular waveguide to a TE 11 ‐mode circular waveguide mode converter based on the use of an intermediate one‐step double‐cruciform section is proposed. The converter achieves compactness and broadband by employing the one‐step double‐cruciform transition instead of the conventional multi‐step transitions or smooth transitions. Due to the one‐step structure, the converter achieves an extremely short‐length (around 0.3 λ , where λ is the wavelength at the centre frequency), which makes it suitable for highly compact systems. For verification purpose, a back‐to‐back connection rectangular‐to‐circular mode converter was fabricated and measured. The measured results show that the return loss is around 15 dB and the insertion loss is around 0.4 dB in the operating frequency band. Thus, we can infer that the return loss and insertion loss of a single mode converter are around 19 and 0.2 dB, respectively. The experimental results reasonably agree with the simulated results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".