MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122913302 · doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2020-0024

Best practices in serving college student Veterans: A scoping review

2021· review· en· W3122913302 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elena Klaw, Brianna Young, KaChun Li, Patrick C. O'Rourke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Military Veteran and Family Health · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Military Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBest practiceMedical educationInstitutionalisationStudent affairsPsychologyHigher educationMedicinePolitical sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LAY SUMMARY Student Veterans are enrolling in college at increasingly rapid rates after separating from the military. Colleges and universities are urged to evaluate and redesign programs targeted to specifically support Veterans. The aim of the current review is to provide a comprehensive examination of the existing literature regarding best practices in serving U.S. student Veterans in higher education. Concrete suggestions related to the implementation, assessment, and institutionalization of best practices are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.270
GPT teacher head0.544
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Military Veteran and Family HealthSame topicEducation and Military IntegrationFrench-language works237,207