MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UX Monocerotis as a W Serpentis binary

2011· article· en· W3122925307 on OpenAlexaff
D. Sudar, P. Harmanec, H. Lehmann, S. Yang, H. Božić, D. Ruždjak

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass ratioBinary numberPhysicsEclipseAstrophysicsBinary starComponent (thermodynamics)Primary (astronomy)Orbital periodLine (geometry)Binary systemStarsThermodynamicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\n Using our new photometric and spectroscopic observations as well as all available\n published data, we present a new interpretation of the properties of the peculiar\n emission-line binary UX Mon. We conclude that this binary is in a rare phase of fast mass\n transfer between the binary components prior to the mass ratio reversal. We firmly\n establish that the orbital period is secularly decreasing at a rate of\n Ṗ = −0.260 s per year. From several lines of reasoning, we show that\n the mass ratio of the component losing mass to the mass-gaining\n component q must be larger than 1 and find our most probable value to\n be q = 1.15 ± 0.1. The BINSYN suite of programs and the steepest descent\n method were used to perform the final modeling. We modeled the star as a W Ser star with a\n thick disk around its primary. Although the remaining uncertainties in some of the basic\n physical elements describing the system in our model are not negligible, the model is in\n fair agreement with available observations. Only the nature of the light variations\n outside the primary eclipse remains unexplained. \n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207