MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122929977

A Tree-Structured Markovian Model of the Shipment Consolidation Process

2016· article· en· W3122929977 on OpenAlexaff
James H. Bookbinder, Shengsuo Cai, Qi‐Ming He

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov processConsolidation (business)Markov chainComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMarkov decision processMarkovian arrival processOperations researchHeuristicEconomic dispatchEngineeringMathematicsEconomicsFinanceStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies the dispatch of consolidated shipments. Orders, following a batch Markovian arrival process, are received in discrete quantities by a depot at discrete time epochs. Instead of immediate dispatch, all outstanding orders are consolidated and shipped together at a later time. The decision of when to send out the consolidated shipment is made based on a “dispatch policy,” which is a function of the system state and/or the costs associated with that state. First, a tree structured Markov chain is constructed to record specific information about the consolidation process; the effectiveness of any dispatch policy can then be assessed by a set of long-run performance measures. Nest, the effect on shipment consolidation of varying the order-arrival process is demonstrated through numerical examples and proved mathematically under some conditions. Finally a heuristic algorithm is developed to determine a favorable parameter of a special set of dispatch policies and the algorithm is proved to yield the overall optimal policy under certain conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207