Identités ouvrières et syndicales, fusion, distanciation et recomposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sur la base des concepts d'identites ouvrieres et syndicales, qui seront redefinis dans la premiere section, il est propose dans cet article de mieux cerner l'impact sur le syndicalisme des transformations en cours dans les milieux de travail. Deux phenomenes majeurs ont ete retenus, soit l'emergence de nouvelles identites ouvrieres et les nouveaux modes de cooperation patronale/syndicale, et ils seront respectivement abordes dans les deuxieme et troisieme sections. Il sera enfin traite, dans une quatrieme section, de l'impact de ces phenomenes sur les identites syndicales et deux modeles syndicaux seront alors proposes pour mieux distinguer les orientations auxquelles le syndicalisme est confronte. Cet article a certes principalement une visie theorique et, pour ce faire, il s'appuie sur une revue critique de la litterature pertinente, tant francaise, anglaise et americaine que canadienne et quEbEcoise. Il repose nEanmoins sur une recherche empirique portant sur les transformations de l'organisation et des relations de travail dans les usines du secteur des pates et papiers au Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".