MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123130443 · doi:10.1088/2632-959x/abddd3

Recent progress and applications of gold nanotechnology in medical biophysics using artificial intelligence and mathematical modeling

2021· article· en· W3123130443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Express · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanotechnologyNanoparticleColloidal goldComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)Materials scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this topical review, we will explore and challenge how artificial intelligence (AI) and mathematical modeling apply towards the future in medical applications, focusing on their interactions with gold nanotechnology. There have been rapid advancements towards the applications of AI and mathematical modeling in medical biophysics. These specific techniques help to improve studies related to nanoscale technology. Many works have been published in relation to this topic; it is now time to collectively analyze and review them to assess the contributions these applications made within nanotechnology. Through this review, both theoretical and clinical data is examined for a fresh and present-day understanding. Observations of set parameters and defined equations through AI and mathematical modeling are made to help give explanation towards variable interaction. This review focuses on gold nanoparticle synthesis and preparation via the Turkevich and Brust and Schiffrins one-pot method. From this, findings show that gold nanoparticle size, shape, and overall functionality affect its synthetic properties. Depending on the characteristics within the gold nanoparticle, its ability to maximize light absorbency, wavelengths, and optical densities within the particle is limited. Finding an ideal wavelength (dependent on nanoparticle sizing) allows for higher absorbency of light within the nanoparticle itself. Examining the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity within the nanoparticle is done so via transmission electron microscope (TEM) and Fourier transform infrared radiation (FT-IR) spectroscopy. By manipulating AI and stochastic and diagnostic models, nanoparticle efficiency within precision cancer therapy is set to ensure maximal treatment. Set conditions allow ideal tumor treatment planning, where manipulated nano-probes are used in gold nanoparticle-based therapy. Versatility in nanoparticle sensors allow for multimodal imaging and assistance towards further diagnostic and therapeutic imaging practices. Drawn conclusions will help expand further knowledge and growth for future gold nanoparticle technology research in medical biophysics application using AI and mathematical modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it