MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123187282 · doi:10.21037/atm-20-5044

Long non-coding RNAs: novel players in the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome

2021· review· en· W3123187282 on OpenAlex
Mixue Tu, Yiqing Wu, Liangshan Mu, Dan Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Translational Medicine · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryCompeting endogenous RNABiologyPhenotypeBioinformaticsPathogenesisTranscriptomeGeneLong non-coding RNAComputational biologyRNAGeneticsGene expressionEndocrinologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of transcripts (>200 nucleotides) lacking protein-coding capacity. Based on the complex three-dimensional structure, lncRNAs are involved in many biological processes and can regulate the expression of target genes at chromatin modification, transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. LncRNAs have been studied in multiple diseases but little is known about their role(s) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common endocrinological disorder in reproductive-aged women around the world. In this review, we characterized and explored the potential mechanisms of lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of PCOS. We found that lncRNAs play a molecular role in PCOS mainly by functioning as the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) and are significantly correlated with some clinical phenotypes. We summarized in detail regarding aberrant lncRNAs in different specimens of women with PCOS [i.e., granulosa cells (GCs), cumulus cells (CCs), follicular fluid (FF), peripheral blood] and various PCOS rodent models [i.e., dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and letrozole induced models]. In clinical practice, detection of lncRNAs in serum might enable early diagnosis. Furthermore, new lncRNA-based classifications might be emerging as potent predictors of a particular phenotype in PCOS. Overall, we proposed new insights for the application of precision medicine approaches to the management of PCOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it