MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123263178

The regulation of entry and aggregate productivity

2006· preprint· en· W3123263178 on OpenAlexaff
Markus Poschke

Bibliographic record

VenueCadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) · 2006
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Productivity
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivityTotal factor productivityCapital intensityCapital (architecture)EconomicsProduction (economics)Barriers to entryIndustrial organizationEuropean unionLabour economicsMonetary economicsInternational tradeBusinessMicroeconomicsHuman capitalMacroeconomicsMarket economyMarket structure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Euro Area economies have lower total factor and labor productivity than the Unites States. I argue that differences in entry cost contribute to this pattern by affecting firms’ technology choice. Introducing technology choice into a standard heterogeneous-firm model, small differences in administrative entry cost can explain around one third of differences in total factor productivity. The productivity difference arises because the reduction in compe-tition due to higher entry costs reduces the incentive to adopt more advanced technologies. Firm heterogeneity, technology choice, and the effect of entry costs on competition all con-tribute to strengthening results compared to previous studies. The effects of entry costs are even larger when the labor market is not competitive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)Same topicEconomic Growth and ProductivityFrench-language works237,207