MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123272013 · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3053487

Maximum Entropy Estimation of Density Function Using Order Statistics

2021· article· en· W3123272013 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Reza, R.L. Kirlin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsOrder statisticQuantileStatisticPrinciple of maximum entropyApplied mathematicsDivergence (linguistics)Entropy (arrow of time)Mathematical optimizationParametric statisticsEstimation theoryMaximum entropy probability distributionSufficient statisticProbability density functionKullback–Leibler divergenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main premise of this article is to develop a maximum entropy estimation of an unknown distribution using order statistics. The exact solution using constraints on the order statistic means is derived. The result is an integral of a rational parametric function whose parameters depend on the order statistic constraints. This integral equation can be solved directly for a small number of order statistic means, e.g., 1, 2, or at most 3, via a multidimensional search in the parameter space. As the number of constraints increases, the search for the optimum parameters becomes formidable. To resolve this problem we have proposed an approximate solution to the resultant integral equation based on Bernstein polynomials and estimates of a desired number of quantiles from available samples. The proposed approximation approach does not require any search in the parameter space and is formulated for any number of samples from an unknown distribution. Performance of this approach is evaluated under various practical conditions by using Kullback-Leibler divergence function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207