UJI EFEKTIFITAS EKSTRAK DAUN PANDAN WANGI (Pandanus amarylifolius) SEBAGAI LARVASIDA TERHADAP LARVA Aedes aegypti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nyamuk Aedesaegypti merupakan (vektor) utama penyakit demam berdarah dengue yang benyakmenyerang Negara tropis termasuk Indonesia. Tindakan pengendalian antara lain melakukan pemberantasanvektor dengan larvasida. Seperti tamaman tersebut adalah tanaman pandan wangi (Pandanus amaryllifolius)mengandung senyawa saponin dan polifenol yang dapat menghambat bahkan membunuh larva Aedesaegypti. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh ekstrak daun pendan wangi (Pandanusamaryllifolius) terhadap pertumbuhan dan perkembangan larva Aedes aegypti. Metode penelitianmenggunakan deskritif eksperimental. Sampel adalah ekstrak daun pandan wangi dan sebagai indikatoradalah larva Aedes aegypti instar III dan IV. Hasil pada konsentarsi ekstrak daun pandan wangi yangdigunakan adalah 0% (g/ml) (kontrol), 5% (g/ml), 6.5% (g/ml), 8% (g/ml), 9.5% (g/ml), 11% (g/ml), 12.5%(g/ml), 14% (g/ml), 15.5% (g/ml), 17% (g/ml), 18.5% (g/ml) dan replikasi sebanyak tiga kali percobaan.:persentase kematian larva Aedes aegypti adalah 0% pada konsentrasi 0%, kematian larva Aedes aegypti14.66% pada konsentrasi 5%, kematian larva Aedes aegypti 81.33% pada konsentrasi 6.5%, kematian larva98.66% pada konsentrasi 8%, dan kemaian larva Aedes aegypti 100% pada konsentrasi 9.5% sampaikonsentrasi 18.5%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".