MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123324095

Pride, Prejudice and Manchurian Heritage: North Korean Migrants and Memories of a Land Left Behind

2020· article· en· W3123324095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLeiden Repository (Leiden University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPeople's Government of Jilin ProvinceUniversity of TorontoUniversiteit Leiden
KeywordsPridePrejudice (legal term)State (computer science)SocializationAgency (philosophy)PopulationEthnic groupGovernment (linguistics)EthnographyGender studiesPolitical scienceGeographySociologyLawDemographySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>This thesis puts the relationship between the North Korean central state’s conservative official culture and variegated forms of real culture under the microscope. Via a survey and interview project conducted in 2016 that involved 1.5 percent of the resettled North Korean defector-migrant population in South Korea, the work thus interrogates the “cultural identities” of North Koreans. It finds that while the North Korean government promotes a vision of itself that is infamously racially charged and enforces ethnic group closure as a principle, ordinary North Korean people retain agency in their lives. Identities emerge that are based on much more than just the socialization processes imposed by the state from above in schools and other institutional settings.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it