Images of Authority, Identity, Power: Facade Mosaic Decoration in Rome during the Later Middle Ages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’examiner de vastes programmes en mosaïque décorant les entrées principales d’un certain nombre d’édifices religieux de Rome, vers la fin du Moyen Âge. Ces mosaïques ont presque toutes disparu, mais on peut reconstituer l’aspect général de leur apparence initiale en utilisant d’anciens dessins et des sources textuelles variées. De plus, on pense que ces cycles narratifs en façade ou près de celle-ci permettaient aux particuliers et aux communautés de comprendre les multiples niveaux de signification de la vie ici-bas et dans l’au-delà, comme autant d’opérateurs de pratiques sociales, culturelles, religieuses et politiques, à l’intérieur d’un environnement physique particulier : celui du tissu urbain de Rome. En outre, dans ces divers milieux qui produisaient et consommaient ces types de décor en façade, des conceptions de l’autorité, de l’identité et du pouvoir voyaient le jour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".