Shenfu injection combined with furosemide in the treatment of chronic heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is an important cause of chronic heart failure, and chronic heart failure is also a serious complication in the end stage of coronary heart disease. At present, there is no specific treatment plan. Shenfu injection has advantages in the treatment of heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease, but there is a lack of standard clinical study to verify this. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with furosemide in the treatment of chronic heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with furosemide in the treatment of coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure. This study will be approved by the clinical research ethics committee of our hospital. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups according to 1:1:(a) Shenfu injection combined with furosemide group and (b) simple furosemide group. Standard treatment for 7 days followed up for 30 days at the same time, pay attention to its efficacy and safety indicators. The total effective rate of cardiac function improvement, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), 6-minute walk test (6-MWTD), and adverse reactions will be observed. Data will be analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS version 25.0 (Chicago, IL). DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with furosemide in the treatment of coronary heart disease with chronic heart failure. The results of this experiment will provide a clinical basis for Shenfu injection combined with furosemide in the treatment of coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/27FPM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".