MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Designing interventions in the ice sheet/sea level system

2020· article· en· W3123378364 on OpenAlexaff
John L. Moore, Michael Wolovick, Bowie Keefer, Oliver Levers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Geoengineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuture sea levelIce sheetOceanographyEnvironmental scienceGlobal warmingEnvironmental resource managementGreenhouse gasClimatologyClimate changeSea iceCryosphereIce shelfGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The marine ice sheet instability may have already been initiated in several glaciers in West Antarctica. Hence controlling global temperatures is unlikely to be an effective way of preventing considerable sea level rise. This limits both the utility of greenhouse gas mitigation and solar radiation geoengineering as control mechanisms. Instead we evaluate various other options such as allowing ice shelves to thicken by reducing bottom melting, or slowing ice streams by drying their beds. We consider the engineering limitations, costs, and practical consequences of various designs and how a ladder of implementation might be climbed with regard to learning from Greenland and small-scale field trials. The governance, ethics, legality and societal implications for the local indigenous and global South are also discussed.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate Change and GeoengineeringFrench-language works237,207