L’embarras des autorités suisses face aux rassemblements d’extrême droite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 15 octobre 2016, Unterwasser, petit village du canton de Saint-Gall, accueille un concert de RAC (Rock Against Communism) qui réunit plus de 5.000 personnes. Signalé à l’attention publique par les médias généralistes, le rassemblement devient un événement national suscitant de nombreuses réactions d’indignation et d’interrogation. Cet article retrace la publicisation de ce « concert néonazi » et ses conséquences pour la collectivité politique suisse. Il s’intéresse au processus par lequel un rassemblement d’extrême droite se mue en problème public et montre les difficultés politico-juridiques qui en découlent pour les autorités cantonales et fédérales, interpelées pour agir face à ce « genre » d’événements. L’étude de ce « concert néonazi » met en exergue une tension constitutive des démocraties libérales : le dilemme que constitue la nécessaire articulation dans un État de droit entre libertés fondamentales et sécurité publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".