Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les études iconographiques du tableau du Titien Diane et Actéon publiées au cour de ces trente dernières années suivent l’interprétation de Ellis Waterhouse selon laquelle le crâne de cerf placé sur un pilier à la droite de la composition annonce la métamorphose d’Actéon et sa mise à mort par ses propres chiens. Selon ces analyses le tableau est ainsi centré sur le destin d’Actéon puni par Diane. L’auteur remarque cependant que des modifications de la couche picturale ont conduit les observateurs à considérer la crâne de cerf comme un motif isolé. Celui-ci ne serait en réalité qu’un simple trophée de chasse de Diane. Titien aurait plutôt choisi de représenter la confrontation initiale entre le chasseur et la déesse. En effet, une telle interprétation de l’épisode mythologique coïncide parfaitement avec les traductions italiennes de Diodore Siculus contemporaines du peintre vénitien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".