MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123753155

Effective tax levels using the Devereux Griffith methodology: Project for the EU Commission TAXUD/2008/CC/099. Report 2009

2009· article· en· W3123753155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Devereux, Christina Elschner, Dieter Endres, Christoph Spengel

Bibliographic record

VenueEconstor (Econstor) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)European commissionMember statesCommissionBusinessWork (physics)ShareholderAccountingInternational economicsFinanceEuropean unionEconomicsInternational tradePolitical scienceCorporate governanceEngineeringLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report on behalf of the EU Commission presents estimates of the effective tax rates on investment in the EU member states over the period 1998 to 2009. Furthermore, the EU candidate countries Croatia, FYROM, Turkey as well as Norway, Switzerland, Canada, Japan and the United States are covered over the period 2005 to 2009. The report extents the work completed in project TAXUD/2005/DE/310. The former report covered the period 1998 to 2007. In addition to the update of previous results, report comprehensively includes the analysis of personal taxes on investment and saving at the shareholder level when calculating effective tax rates on domestic investment. The report considers primarily taxes on corporations in each country, but also includes analysis of personal taxes on investment and saving. It also considers both cross-border investment and investment by small and medium sized enterprises (SME).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconstor (Econstor)Same topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207