El lugar de los abuelos en el seno de las familias: reflexiones sobre el Derecho argentino
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, the three elements on which traditional family structure has been designed like gender, age and consanguinity are broken -or at least weakened-. In accordance with the former, female emancipation which took place from the second half of the 20th century on, led to the inclusion of women in productive-working spaces, generating the conditions for the mothers to request help from the grandparents in the care of minor children. In addition to this, the recent increase in divorces and separations of couples who constituted nuclear families results in –before the breakdown of these unions- an important place of grandparents in the care and support of the youngest members of the family. With reference to the second element, there has been a democratization of intra-familiar relationships allowing for those who have been historically seen as subordinate subjects to enjoy their right to autonomy and personal freedom, in conditions of equality and dignity, including grandparents or great-grandparents, elderly people. With regards to the third element, socio-affectivity has been recognized as a determining requirement for interpersonal relations, on par with the biological budget, giving rise to approaches and questions regarding the place of kindred grandparents within the framework of assembled families. In essence, the abovementioned events have operated as factors for a re-reading of the legal roles of grandparents within families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".