MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123776396 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.05927

Integration of IRS in Indoor VLC Systems: Challenges, Potential and Promising Solutions

2021· preprint· en· W3123776396 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Amine Arfaoui, Ali Ghrayeb, Chadi Assi

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisible light communicationComputer scienceWirelessChannel (broadcasting)Optical wirelessChannel state informationElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visible light communication (VLC) is an optical wireless communication technology that is considered a promising solution for high-speed indoor connectivity. Unlike the case in conventional radio-frequency wireless systems, the VLC channel is not isotropic, meaning that the device orientation affects the channel gain significantly. In addition, due to the use of optical frequency bands, the presence of different obstacles (e.g., walls, human bodies, furniture) may easily block the VLC links. One solution to overcome these issues is the integration of the intelligent reflective surface (IRS), which is a new and revolutionizing technology that has the potential to significantly improve the performance of wireless networks. IRS is capable of smartly reconfiguring the wireless propagation environment with the use of massive low-cost passive reflecting elements integrated on a planar surface. In this paper, a framework for integrating IRS in indoor VLC systems is presented. We give an overview of IRS, including its advantages, different types and main applications in VLC systems, where we demonstrate the potential of IRS in overcoming the effects of random device orientation and links blockages. We discuss key factors pertaining to the design and integration of IRS in VLC systems, namely, the deployment of IRSs, the channel state information acquisition, the optimization of IRS configuration and the real-time IRS control. We also lay out a number of promising research directions that center around the integration of IRS in indoor VLC systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207