MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123791070 · doi:10.7202/1073072ar

Le vitrail néo-gothique en France au XIXe siècle

2020· article· en· W3123791070 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Catherine Brisac

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStained glassArtWorshipArt historyVisual artsWindow (computing)TheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iconographers, conservators of public monuments, architect, literary and political enthusiasts of the Gothic revival were unanimous in France in the 1830s in supporting restoration of medieval stained glass. Generally in precarious conditions, windows of Gothic churches were fragmentary, darkened, and illegible. Early in the nineteenth century when cathedrals had been refurbished to be opened again for worship, medieval stained glass was repaired rather than restored by glaziers who joined panels or pieces of different provenances within a single window. One of the first restorations in France professedly using medieval stained glass techniques was that of the St. George window in the Cathedral of Clermont-Ferrand in 1836 by local founders of a “painted glass manufactory.” The firm's procedures in reordering elements of the window, in excessive cleaning of old glass or substitution of new pieces became a model, unofficially endorsed by the Office of Religion (l’administration des cultes), for other French workshops. Rearrangements were often ingenious and may be difficult even now for a practiced eye to detect. From motives related to contemporary mentality and/or ignorance of medieval imagery, stained glass workers frequently falsified or transformed the subjects of Gothic windows. An instance was the Clermontois firm's obliteration of historiated medallions in the window of St. Cyprian of Carthage in the Cathedral of Lyon and substitution of a cycle dedicated to founders of the church in Lyon. These practices co-existed with better measures such as the systematic tracing of stained glass prior to restoration adopted at the Cathedral of Le Mans from 1839. Restorations like that of Lyon continued in spite of vigorous criticism from Fathers Cahier and Martin, instructions issued by the Office of Diocesan Buildings in 1848 and creation of the Commission on Stained Glass (1849-53). A late “success” in this line was the reworking of windows in the Chapel of the Virgin, Cathedral of Le Mans by Nicholas Coffetier and Louis Steinheil (1866-82); incorporating nineteenth-century Marian iconography, the ensemble seemed to contemporaries more Gothic in its formal and chromatic effect than work that was more authentic. By this date the religious and national symbolism of thirteenth-century Gothic was losing ground. Creation of new stained glass received a major impetus as a result of vandalism by revolutionaries and by cathedral chapters in the eighteenth century; new windows were ordered for bays from which the originals had long since disappeared or in which they had never existed. Glassworkers looked to Gothic models, consulting publications such as that of Fathers Cahier and Martin on the ensemble at Bourges, but chose to render freely an imagery pertinent to clergy, the faithful or the political ambition of patrons. Though the Office of Religion intervened more in connection with new designs than with restoration, it was often possible to circumvent their control. Cardinal de Bonald, who ordered the cycle on founders of the church in Lyon, sponsored without submitting to the Office important new designs on such subjects as Pope Gregory vii conferring the primateship of the Gauls to St. Gébuin, Archbishop of Lyon, in 1079. With other such examples they form part of a new and diverse iconographical corpus. The erroneous belief encouraged by “medievalists” that Gothic stained glass was oriented towards education of the people informed a choice of themes beyond those standard in Christian doctrine, emphasizing the medieval history and symbolism of the Church as witness of renewed power of the bishop. On the other hand, architects such as Viollet-le-Duc approached the installation of stained glass in an archaeological sense grounded in belief that unity of style had been achieved in the thirteenth century. After 1880 this archaeological understanding gave way to that of stained glass as pictorial form. Neo-Gothic stained glass came to an end when the conflicts between Church and State (law separating them in 1905) became unmanageable for both sides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207