MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123834545 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2021.3054240

Demonstration of 108 Gb/s Duo-Binary PAM-8 Transmission and the Probabilistic Modeling of DB-PAM-M BER

2021· article· en· W3123834545 on OpenAlexafffund
Md. Ghulam Saber, R. Gutiérrez-Castrejón, Zhenping Xing, Md Samiul Alam, Eslam El‐Fiky, D. E. Ceballos-Herrera, Fabio Cavaliere, Gemma Vall-llosera, Stéphane Lessard, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)McGill University
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesInternational Society for Optical Engineering
KeywordsBit error rateLow-density parity-check codeBinary numberForward error correctionPseudorandom binary sequenceComputer scienceProbabilistic logicTransmission (telecommunications)AlgorithmElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsDecoding methodsEngineeringArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report 108 Gb/s Duo-Binary PAM-8 (DB-PAM-8) transmission using direct-detection aided by Volterra equalizer. The bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the DB-PAM-8 signal has been evaluated through error counting by varying the bit rate, received optical power, and reach. The experimental results suggest that up to 108, 102, and 84 Gb/s signals can be propagated in back-to-back (B2B), and over 10, and 20 km of standard single-mode fiber (SMF), respectively, below the low-density parity-check forward error correction (LDPC-FEC) threshold. Furthermore, we derive a probabilistic model of the BER for multilevel DB-PAM-M signaling that is verified using our measurements. The model of this important performance metric turned out to be accurate enough, especially at low BER values, where its use is more convenient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207