MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3123882605 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab574

The stellar distribution function and local vertical potential from <i>Gaia</i> DR2

2021· article· en· W3123882605 on OpenAlexafffund
Haochuan Li, Lawrence M. Widrow

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyStellar densitySpiral galaxyParameter spaceGalactic planeStarsDistribution functionPhase spacePlane (geometry)Distribution (mathematics)Mathematical analysisGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We develop a novel method to simultaneously determine the vertical potential, force, and stellar z−vz phase space distribution function (DF) in our local patch of the Galaxy. We assume that the Solar Neighbourhood can be treated as a one-dimensional (1D) system in dynamical equilibrium and directly fit the number density in the z−vz plane to what we call the rational linear distribution function (RLDF) model. This model can be regarded as a continuous sum of isothermal DFs though it has only one more parameter than the isothermal model. We apply our method to a sample of giant stars from Gaia Data Release 2 and show that the RLDF provides an excellent fit to the data. The well-known phase space spiral emerges in the residual map of the z−vz plane. We use the best-fitting potential to plot the residuals in terms of the frequency and angle of vertical oscillations and show that the spiral maps into a straight line. From its slope, we estimate that the phase spirals were generated by a perturbation ∼540 Myr years ago. We also determine the differential surface density as a function of vertical velocity dispersion, a.k.a. the vertical temperature distribution. The result is qualitatively similar to what was previously found for SDSS/SEGUE G dwarfs. Finally, we address parameter degeneracies and the validity of the 1D approximation. Particularly, the mid-plane density derived from a cold sub-sample, where the 1D approximation is more secure, is closer to literature values than that derived from the sample as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→