Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the <scp>Mekong River</scp> basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Assessments of climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment processes are essential for developing science‐based sustainable watershed management plans. We assessed climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River Basin, as a case study. Future climate scenarios including an ensemble‐mean climate scenario (EnM scenario) were generated based on 20 GCMs in CMIP5, using a stochastic weather generator (LARS‐WG) coupled with a distribution‐free shuffle procedure. The SWAT model was applied to simulate changes in streamflow and sediment load for the future period 2071–2100 under RCP8.5 with respect to the baseline period 1971–2000. Results show that mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature were projected to increase by all the 20 GCMs, with an ensemble‐mean increase of 4.6–5.7°C and 4.2–5.8°C across the 12 months, respectively. An increase in mean annual precipitation (3.4–55.8%) and streamflow (1.0–72.7%) was also projected by all GCMs. However, projected changes in sediment load were not consistent. One half of the GCMs projected an increase (5.2–53.2%) in annual sediment load while the other half projected a decrease (5.1%–43.2%). In each month, at least three‐quarters of the GCMs projected an increase in monthly streamflow. For monthly sediment load, an increase in May to July was projected by over half of the GCMs, while a decrease was projected by a majority of the GCMs for other months. Our results indicate large uncertainties in streamflow and sediment projections under climate change, demonstrating the need to use multi‐model ensembles in climate change impact studies. Moreover, it was found that the streamflow and sediment loads simulated using the EnM scenario were often close to the ensemble means simulated using the 20 GCMs, which implies that the single EnM scenario has the potential of effectively and efficiently estimating the ensemble means of projections in a multi‐model ensemble.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".