Influences et répercussions de la pandémie sur les apprentissages et le parcours universitaire des étudiant·e·s aux cycles supérieurs en sciences de l’éducation : retour d’expérience de trois doctorantes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Influences et rpercussions de la pandmie sur les apprentissages et le parcours universitaire des tudiantes aux cycles suprieurs en sciences de l'ducation : retour d'exprience de trois doctorantes Formation et profession 28(4 hors-srie), 2020 sum Lors de cette pandmie mondiale sans prcdent, le domaine de l' ducation a t particulirement touch alors que les tablissements d' enseignement n' ont eu d'autre choix que de fermer leurs portes en prsentiel plus de 1,6 milliard d'apprenantes et 60 millions d' enseignantes travers le monde. Les tablissements universitaires n'y faisant pas exception, les influences et les rpercussions sont notables chez les tudiantes universitaires, entre autres chez les tudiantes aux cycles suprieurs en sciences de l' ducation. Dans ce retour d' exprience de trois doctorantes, trois axes phares ont t tablis : la sant psychologique, les conditions de travail et les tches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it