Protection en matiere de pensions, situation par rapport a la retraite et taux de remplacement du revenu d'une cohorte de personnes agees canadiennes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On utilise les donnees de la banque de donnees administratives longitudinales (DAL) pour comparer la situation a la retraite et les taux de remplacement du revenu atteints par des personnes qui, en 1991 et/ou en 1992, alors qu'elles etaient au milieu de la cinquantaine, participaient a un regime de pension agree (RPA) et ne participaient pas. Pour les hommes de la cohorte, la probabilite d'etre a la retraite a l'age de 70 a 72 ans etait de 4 a 14 points de pourcentage plus elevee parmi les participants a un regime de pension que parmi les non-participants. Les donnees employees pour l'etude ne fournissent pas de renseignements sur la raison pour laquelle les non-participants a un RPA ont tendance a prendre leur retraite plus tard que les participants. Pour les personnes retraitees, il n'y avait pas de difference significative entre les taux de remplacement du revenu des participants a un RPA et ceux des non-participants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".