Bartolommeo Traballesi’s Rain of Gold and the Poetics of Power in Francesco I’s Scrittoio in the Palazzo della Signoria, Florence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Pluie d’or de Bartolommeo Traballesi est plaçée de façon prééminente sur le mur principal du Scrittoio de Francesco Ier. Malgré sa grande visibilité, la peinture de Traballesi n’a pas fait l’objet d’étude savante. Cet article n’est qu’une première ébauche d’une étude plus approfondie sur le sujet et tente d’expliquer l’iconographie de la Pluie d’or pour la première fois. Le tableau contient un très grand nombre de motifs iconographiques significatifs qui, se combinant les uns aux autres, nous informent sur le règne exceptionnel des Médicis. Ce règne remonte à travers le XIVe siècle jusqu’à la fondation de Florence et revient par les ducs médicéens Alessandro et Cosimo Ier, au mécène du Scrittoio, le prince régent Francesco Ier. Enfin, cette étude montre, de façon non équivoque, que le Scrittoio est un manifeste politique, comme tous les autres programmes décoratifs commandés pour le Palais de la Seigneurie, le siège du gouvernement de Florence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".