MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124013169 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.05814

Stochastic Evolution Equations in Banach Spaces and Applications to the Heath-Jarrow-Morton-Musiela Equation

2016· preprint· en· W3124013169 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessMathematicsSemigroupBanach spaceSobolev spaceMartingale (probability theory)Markov chainPure mathematicsLp spaceApplied mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this thesis is threefold. Firstly, we study the stochastic evolution equations (driven by an infinite dimensional cylindrical Wiener process) in a class of Banach spaces satisfying the so-called H-condition. In particular, we deal with the questions of the existence and uniqueness of solutions for such stochastic evolution equations. Moreover, we analyse the Markov property of the solution. \n \nSecondly, we apply the abstract results obtained in the first part to the so-called Heath-Jarrow-Morton-Musiela (HJMM) equation. In particular, we prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the HJMM equation in a large class of function spaces, such as the weighted Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces. \n \nThirdly, we study the ergodic properties of the solution to the HJMM equation. In particular, we analyse the Markov property of the solution and we find a sufficient condition for the existence and uniqueness of an invariant measure for the Markov semigroup associated to the HJMM equation (when the coefficients are time independent) in the weighted Lebesgue spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207