MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124053448 · doi:10.18280/ria.340610

Microarray Breast Cancer Data Clustering Using Map Reduce Based K-Means Algorithm

2020· article· en· W3124053448 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hymavathi Thottathyl, K. Karteeka Pavan, Rajeev Priyatam Panchadula

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerCluster analysisMicroarray analysis techniquesCancerComputer scienceMicroarrayData miningAlgorithmBioinformaticsArtificial intelligenceMedicineInternal medicineBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is one of the world's most advanced and most common cancers occurring in women. An early diagnosis of breast cancer offers treatment for it; therefore, several experiments are in development establishing approaches for the early detection of breast cancer. The great increase in research in the last decade in microarray data processing is a potent tool of diagnosing diseases. Based on genomic knowledge, micro-arrays have changed the way clinical pathology recognizes, identifies, and classifies the diseases of humans, particularly those of cancer. In this article, we examined microarray data for breast cancer with the k-means clustering algorithm, but it was hard to scale and process a large number of micro-array data alone. To this end, we use a chart to minimize the paradigm for evaluating microarray data on breast cancer. Moreover, the efficiency of the parallel k-means model is measured with the operating period, the scaling, and all runtime of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207