MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124073670 · doi:10.1080/14767058.2021.1876656

Neonatal blood pressure before and after delayed umbilical cord clamping

2021· article· en· W3124073670 on OpenAlexaff
Claudio V. Schenone, Pedro Argoti, Patricia J. Goedecke, Giancarlo Mari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUmbilical cordBlood pressureGestational agePercentileAnalysis of varianceCorrelationApgar scoreObstetricsPregnancyAnesthesiaInternal medicineMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To describe values of blood pressure (BP) before and after delayed cord clamping (DCC) in healthy term neonates born to low risk pregnancies, examine differences in the temporal patterns of BP during this transition, and assess potential correlation of these parameters with maternal and perinatal clinical and demographic variables.Methods Prospective observational study of term infants eligible for DCC born vaginally from uncomplicated pregnancies. Neonatal BP was estimated noninvasively before DCC, at 30 min and 24 h of life. Median, minimum, maximum, mean and standard deviation, as well as percentiles for BP values were calculated. Pearson correlation assessed the correlation between demographic and clinical variables and BP measurements. Spearman correlation studied the association between BP parameters prior to DCC and Apgar scores. Repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analyses were used to compare BP measurements over time. A p-value of <.05 was considered significant.Results A total of 54 patients were included. Mean neonatal birthweight was 3185 g and gestational age 39/3 weeks. The mean values for the systolic, diastolic, and mean BP prior to DCC were 97 ± 24.9 mmHg, 58 ± 21.9 mmHg and 67 ± 27.7 mmHg respectively. A statistically significant difference was detected when comparing BP values obtained before DCC with those measured afterwards (Figure 1). A positive correlation was found between SBP and MAP prior to DCC and Apgar scores at 1 min.Neonatal blood pressure before and after delayed umbilical cord clampingAll authorsClaudio V. Schenone, Pedro Argoti, Patricia Goedecke & Giancarlo Marihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1876656Published online:21 January 2021Figure 1. Repeated measures ANOVA for SBP, DBP, and MAP distribution over time.Figure 1. Repeated measures ANOVA for SBP, DBP, and MAP distribution over time.Conclusion We describe novel values of BP before DCC in healthy term infants following vaginal delivery. Data suggest that neonates whose cord is clamped in a delayed fashion experience an increase blood pressures immediately after birth, followed by a significant drop within 30 min to levels that remain unchanged at 24 h of life. BP values obtained after DCC in our study are similar to those found by previous authors. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings and assess the potential of BP prior to DCC to evaluate immediate postnatal adaptation.Limitations Results generalizability may have been limited by varying degrees of neonatal resuscitation, inability to perform more than one measurement before cord clamping ensued, as well as an unequal distribution of self-reported race in our cohort. Also, noninvasive BP estimates have proven less accurate that invasive methods. Finally, our cohort was comprised by a relatively small sample and larger studies will be required to corroborate our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal MedicineSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207