Colorimetric properties and structural evolution of cathodic electrochromic WO<sub>3</sub> thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cathodic amorphous tungsten trioxide (WO3) thin films have been deposited by reactive direct current magnetron sputtering and have been studied for their colorimetric and electrochromic properties. Those studies were carried out under two different potential cycling process: (i) switching mode (the response between coloration and bleaching in increasing potential steps) and (ii) modulation mode (the stepwise modulation to coloration with increasing potential and back to bleaching). Optical measurements, performed as a function of applied potential, showed excellent transmittance contrasts (∼80%) between colored and bleached states. The color stimuli and the changes that take place upon reversible switching or modulation were recorded based on the Commisson International de l’Éclairage (CIE) system. It was found that, under various potentials, significant changes occurred in the hue and saturation for WO3, as exhibited by the CIE 1931 xy chromaticity coordinates. As WO3 was reduced (W6+ + e– → W5+), a sharp decrease in luminance was observed. Excellent reversibility is demonstrated not only by colorimetric properties, but also by the corresponding intrinsic structures of the films, as investigated by µ-Raman spectroscopy. Furthermore, the WO3 films displayed a fast response time and good long-term cycling durability, which was attributed to their amorphous nature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".