MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124098108 · doi:10.1093/bjs/znaa016

Monitoring the evolving impact of COVID-19 on institutional surgical services: imperative for quality improvement platforms

2020· article· en· W3124098108 on OpenAlexaff
Shek Ming Leung, Mohammed Al‐Omran, Elisa Greco, Mohammad Qadura, Mark Wheatcroft, Muhammad Mamdani, David Gómez, Charles de Mestral

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoQueen's UniversitySt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakService (business)Quality (philosophy)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Quality managementData collectionIntensive care medicineMedical emergencyOperations managementMarketingInternal medicinePathologyBusinessDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a massive slow down of scheduled surgical services, leading to concerns about increased morbidity from delayed care and of a large backlog of patients. In these times it is critical to collect and monitor data on surgical service volumes to help minimize the consequences to our patients. Here we describe our institutional vascular service volumes through the pandemic to date, demonstrating how quality improvement platforms can be useful tools for proactive data collection and monitoring.. Continued evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207