MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124123520 · doi:10.4271/2021-01-0774

Dynamic Modelling of Multiphase Machines Based on the VSD Transformation

2021· article· en· W3124123520 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Taylor, Diego F. Valencia, Wesam Taha, Mustafa Mohamadian, Daniel Luedtke, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh, Berker Bilgin, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlux linkageHarmonicsSubspace topologyControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceFinite element methodTransformation (genetics)ReachabilityTorqueAlgorithmEngineeringVoltageDirect torque controlPhysicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Multiphase machines continue to increase in popularity in high power applications due to their proven benefits compared to their three-phase counterparts. However, with the increased phase number and, therefore, the increased number of degrees of freedom, the complexity of both modelling and control strategies significantly increases. This paper proposes a dynamic modelling method for six-phase interior permanent magnet machines using the vector space decomposition transformation, which can be extended to machines with any number of phases. The proposed technique considers the nonlinear characteristics of the machine, such as spatial harmonics, magnetic saturation, and cross-coupling, which are based on flux linkage look-up tables from finite element analysis. The main contribution of this paper is the consideration of the effect of harmonic components and asymmetries within the machine windings on losses. These effects are mapped into a subspace orthogonal to the conventional <i>dq</i> subspace, which calls for additional transformations based on the field-oriented control structure. The proposed modelling strategy also allows for the inclusion of the high-frequency components generated from the switching instances from an inverter. The accuracy of the proposed model is validated through a comparison of the finite element analysis and Simulink torque waveforms and a comparison of Simulink and experimental current waveforms at low load operating conditions.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in MobilitySame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207