MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124165648 · doi:10.1080/10610278.2021.1873991

Calix[4]arene sulfonate hosts selectively modified on the upper rim: a study of nicotine binding strength and geometry

2021· article· en· W3124165648 on OpenAlexafffund
Zoey Warmerdam, Bianca Kamba, Alok Shaurya, XuXin Sun, Mary K. Maguire, Fraser Hof

Bibliographic record

VenueSupramolecular chemistry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryTitrationCalixareneSulfonateNicotineStereochemistryCotinineNitroPhenolsCucurbiturilCrystallographyMedicinal chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCrystal structureSupramolecular chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the synthesis and structure-activity relationships of sulfonatocalix[4]arene hosts bearing novel substitutions. The calix[4]arenes are modified on the upper rim at either one or two of the phenolic units, where the dual modifications are introduced regioselectively on neighbouring or opposing phenols. The calix[4]arenes are mono- or di-functionalised with nitro or formyl groups, with the remaining upper-rim sites in all cases occupied by sulphonates. Equilibrium association constants were determined between each host and the guests nicotine, nornicotine, and cotinine. Indicator displacement-based binding studies show that nicotine binds most strongly to the different members of the library followed by nornicotine, whereas cotinine displays weak to no binding. NMR titrations were carried out with nicotine and show different host-guest interaction geometries for the formyl-calix[4]arenes versus the nitro-calix[4]arenes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSupramolecular chemistrySame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207