MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124166454 · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2021.01.040

Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring With a Wireless Ultrasound Patch

2021· review· en· W3124166454 on OpenAlexaff
Jon‐Émile S. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodynamicsCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Emerging Technology Review, a novel, wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound patch is described as a tool for resuscitation. The device is designed, foremost, as a functional hemodynamic monitor-a simple, fast, and consistent method for measuring hemodynamic change with preload variation. More generally, functional hemodynamic monitoring is a paradigm that helps predict stroke volume response to additional intravenous volume. Because Doppler ultrasound of the left ventricular outflow tract noninvasively measures stroke volume in realtime, it increasingly is deployed for this purpose. Nevertheless, Doppler ultrasound in this manner is cumbersome, especially when repeat assessments are needed. Accordingly, peripheral arteries have been studied and various measures from the common carotid artery Doppler signal act as windows to the left ventricle. Yet, handheld Doppler ultrasound of a peripheral artery is susceptible to human measurement error and statistical limitations from inadequate beat sample size. Therefore, a wearable Doppler ultrasound capable of continuous assessment minimizes measurement inconsistencies and smooths inherent physiologic variation by sampling many more cardiac cycles. Reaffirming clinical studies, the ultrasound patch tracks immediate SV change with excellent accuracy in healthy volunteers when cardiac preload is altered by various maneuvers. The wearable ultrasound also follows jugular venous Doppler, which qualitatively trends right atrial pressure. With further clinical research and the application of artificial intelligence, the monitoring modalities with this new technology are manifold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207