MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124192682 · doi:10.46747/cfp.670131

PEER simplified decision aid: chronic back pain treatment options in primary care

2021· article· en· W3124192682 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jessica Kirkwood, G. Michael Allan, Christina Korownyk, James McCormack, Scott Garrison, Betsy Thomas, Joey Ton, Danielle Perry, Michael R. Kolber, Nicolas Dugré, Samantha Moe, Adrienne J. Lindblad

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCollege of Family Physicians of CanadaCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialChronic painPrimary careAlternative medicinePhysical therapyMEDLINEBack painLow back painFamily medicineSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This decision aid was developed to provide clinicians with a review of the effectiveness of chronic back pain treatment options while highlighting study quality. It is derived from our accompanying systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on chronic low back pain ( page e20 ).[1][1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.271
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.271
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0150.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4340.127

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family PhysicianSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207