L’exposition de la modernité artistique, lieu de construction de l’identité nationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates the relation between art exhibitions and political issues by analysing a few exhibitions with titles referring to national identity, such as La peinture canadienne moderne. 25 années de peinture au Canada français, Canada 101 and Canada, art d’aujourd’hui. These exhibitions were organized during the sixties by both Canadian and Quebecois governmental agencies and were intended to be seen abroad. Within the paradoxical modernist duality, in which modernity is presented as both nationally rooted and internationally defined, such exhibitions raised the issue of national identity. The communities of taste that received the mandate of organizing these events tried to impose what they each considered as the genuine definition of Canadian artistic modernity. An intense confrontation and renewal of Canadian and Quebecois nationalisms characterized this period. Thus, this article examines how exhibitions may receive political signification through their setting, the social conditions in which they were held and the discourse produced to accompany them. These exhibitions also participated in the definition of both new Canadian and new Quebecois national identities, each of them being involved in a transforming process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".