A Stochastic Economic Growth Model with Health Capital and State-Dependent Probabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analyze a simple stochastic model of economic growth in which physical and health capital accumulation jointly contribute to determine long run economic growth. Health capital is subject to random shocks via the effects of behavioral changes: unpredictable changes in individuals’ attitude toward healthy behaviors may reduce the effectiveness of health services provision; this in turn, by reducing the production of new health capital, lowers economic production activities negatively affecting economic growth. Unlike the extant literature, we assume that the probability with which such random shocks occur is not constant but state-dependent. Specifically, the probability that behavioral changes will negatively impact on health capital and economic growth depends on the level of economic development, proxied by the relative abundance of health capital with respect to physical capital. We show that our model’s dynamics can be converted into an iterated function system with state-dependent probabilities which converges to an invariant self-similar measure supported on a (possibly fractal) compact attractor. We develop a numerical method to approximate the invariant distribution to illustrate its features in specific model’s parametrizations, exemplifying thus the effects of state-dependent probabilities on the model’s steady state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".