MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124271845 · doi:10.31000/jt.v10i1.4025

Struktur SRPMK DAN SRPMM Pada Bangunan Tinggi (Structure of SRMK and SRMM on High Building)

2021· article· en· W3124271845 on OpenAlexaff
Almufid Almufid, Egi Santoso

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknik · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Earthquake resistanceSeismic zoneEngineeringStructural engineeringGeographyCivil engineeringArchaeologyInduced seismicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the planning of building structures, it is necessary to have precise calculations so that the structure obtained is strong against loads and is certainly economical. From a geographical point of view, Indonesia is one of the countries on the most active earthquake route in the world because it is surrounded by the Pacific Ring of Fire and is above three continental plate collisions (triple junction plate convergence), thus making Indonesia a country that is has a high earthquake risk level. In Indonesia itself there are several provisions that apply where there are regulations in planning a building to be earthquake resistant. As for this research study is to plan a 10-story apartment structure using the Special Moment Bearer Frame System (SRPMK) and the Intermediate Moment Bearer Frame System (SRPMM) based on SNI 2847-2019, SNI 1726-2019, and SNI 1727-2013 and other provisions. applicable in Indonesia to support earthquake resistant building planning. At this stage, it begins with preliminary design, then structural modeling and analysis is assisted using the ETABS program. From the planning results obtained in the form of dimensions and differences from the calculation of reinforcement between the two systems used.Keywords: SRPMK, SRPMM, Earthquake Resistant Building Planning, ETABS (Dalam perencanaan struktur bangunan diperlukan adanya perhitungan yang tepat agar struktur yang didapat kuat terhadap beban serta yang pasti ekonomis. Jika dilihat dari segi geografis Indonesia menjadi salah satu negara yang berada di jalur gempa teraktif di dunia karena dikelilingi oleh Cincin Api Pasifik (Ring of Fire) dan berada di atas tiga tumbukan lempeng benua (triple junction plate convergence), sehingga menjadikan Indonesia sebagai negara yang memiliki tangkat resiko gempa cukup tinggi. Di Indonesia sendiri ada beberapa ketentuan yang berlaku dimana ada peraturan-peraturan dalam merencanakan suatu bangunan agar tahan terhadap gempa. Adapun dari studi penelitian ini adalah merencanakan struktur apartemen 10 lantai menggunakan Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus (SRPMK) dan Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Menengah (SRPMM) berdasarkan SNI 2847-2019, SNI 1726-2019, dan SNI 1727-2013 serta ketentuan-ketentuan lain yang berlaku di Indonesia untuk menunjang perencanaan bangunan tahan gempa. Pada tahapannya diawali dengan preliminary design, lalu pemodelan serta analisa struktur dibantu menggunakan program ETABS. Dari hasil perencanaan didapat berupa dimensi dan perbedaan dari hasil perhitungan tulangan antara kedua sistem yang digunakan..Kata Kunci: SRPMK, SRPMM, Perencanaan Bangunan Gedung Tahan Gempa, ETABS)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal TeknikSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207