MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124295462 · doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.12.025

Drilling signals analysis for tricone bit condition monitoring

2021· article· en· W3124295462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Science and Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFaculty of Engineering, McGill University
KeywordsBit (key)DrillingVibrationAutomationEngineeringState (computer science)Computer scienceMechanical engineeringAcousticsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel approach to investigate the relations between drilling signals and bit wear condition in real world full-scale mining operations. This research addresses the increasing demand for automation in mining to increase the efficiency, safety, and ability to work in harsh environments. A crucial issue in fully autonomous unmanned drilling is to have a system to detect the bit wear condition through the drilling signals analysis in real time. In this work, based on extensive field studies, a novel qualitative method for tricone bit wear state classification is developed and introduced. The relations between drilling vibration as well as electric motor current signals and bit wear are investigated and bit failure vibration frequencies, regardless of the geological conditions, are introduced. Bit failure frequencies are experimentally investigated and analytically calculated. Finally, the effect of bit design parameters on the failure frequencies is presented for the application of bit wear condition monitoring and bit failure prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it