Bibliographic record
Abstract
« Les technologies de l’information et des communications et la gestion des patrimoines immobiliers educatifs » etait le theme d’un seminaire international du PEB qui s’est tenu a Montreal, au Canada, du 31 octobre au 3 novembre 2004. Le but de ce seminaire etait d’examiner la question de l’integration des technologies de l’information et des communications (TIC) a la gestion des patrimoines immobiliers educatifs en se demandant comment ces dernieres sont susceptibles d’ameliorer d’une part la fonctionnalite des espaces voues a ces apprentissages, d’autre part leur confort dans un contexte de developpement durable ainsi que la securite et la protection des installations et enfin l’optimisation de la gestion technique et administrative que l’on en fait. Les participants ont eu l’opportunite de faire le constat des theories enoncees lors du seminaire tout en visitant des institutions innovantes dans chacun des domaines a Montreal et en banlieue. Un bref survol des visites est disponible ci-dessous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".