MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3124433189

Identifying Changes in Mean, Seasonality, Persistence and Volatility for G7 and Euro Area Inflation

2008· preprint· en· W3124433189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erdenebat Bataa, Denise R. Osborn, Marianne Sensier, Dick van Dijk

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2008
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic and Social Research Council
KeywordsVolatility (finance)EconomicsEconometricsSeasonalityPersistence (discontinuity)Seasonal adjustmentMonetary economicsFinancial economicsStatisticsMathematicsVariable (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the properties of monthly CPI inflation in G7 countries and the Euro area (aggregate) over the period 1973-2007 using a new iterative decomposition procedure that separates changes in mean, seasonal and dynamic components together with conditional volatility. We uncover mean and seasonality breaks for all countries and, even allowing for these, changes in persistence are indicated for all countries except Canada. Further, while volatility reductions are widespread in the mid- to early 1980s, Canada, France and the US all exhibit increased volatility from 1999 onwards. Of methodological interest, iteration is shown to provide more evidence of persistence breaks and fewer volatility breaks overall compared with the usual approach of sequentially examining changes in the properties of inflation, while application of linear seasonal adjustment also reduces evidence of persistence breaks. Although failure to allow for breaks in mean, seasonal or dynamic components affects conclusions about the existence and dates of volatility breaks, nevertheless, evidence remains of a volatility increase in some countries in 1999.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics→Same topicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact→French-language works237,207→