Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the direction of Benoit A. Aubert and Jean-Grégoire Bernard Organizations, whether private or public, local or global, diversified or not, operate in constantly changing environments, making the analysis and management of risk-performance relationships crucial. Risk management requires financial, technological and organizational measures to modify the relationship between environmental turbulence and variability in outcomes. Hence the importance of an integrated vision of organizational risks. The challenge of integration is to expand the areas of use of existing techniques, identify gaps and develop new measurement tools. This book is part of this trend, which first presents the measures used in various fields before dealing successively with financial risks, project management risks, contractual risks, major industrial risks, human health risks and environmental risks. After presenting the different modes of integration, the authors describe and analyze the case of a company that must evaluate an expansion project, taking into account this concept and practice of integrated risk measurement. Published by Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, ISBN 2-7606-1966-4; 524 pages; price: $69.95 To order the book: https://www.pum.umontreal.ca/catalogue/mesure-integree-du-risque-dans-les-organisations Sous la direction de Benoit A. Aubert et Jean-Grégoire Bernard Les organisations, qu'elles soient privées ou publiques, locales ou globales, diversifiées ou non, fonctionnent dans des environnements constamment en évolution, ce qui rend cruciales l'analyse et la gestion des relations risques-performance. La gestion des risques exige l'adoption de mesures financières, technologiques et organisationnelles en vue de modifier la relation entre la turbulence dans l'environnement et la variabilité dans les résultats. D'où l'importance d'une vision intégrée des risques organisationnels. Le défi de l'intégration est d'élargir les zones d'utilisation des techniques existantes, d'en identifier les lacunes et de développer de nouveaux outils de mesure. C'est dans ce courant que s'inscrit cet ouvrage qui présente d'abord les mesures utilisées dans différents domaines avant de traiter successivement des risques financiers, des risques reliés à la gestion de projet, des risques contractuels, des risques industriels majeurs, des risques en santé humaine et des risques en environnement. Après avoir présenté les différents modes d'intégration, les auteurs décrivent et analysent le cas d'une entreprise qui doit évaluer un projet d'agrandissement, en tenant compte de ce concept et de cette pratique de la mesure intégrée du risque. Publié par les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, ISBN 2-7606-1966-4; 524 pages; prix: 69, 95 $ Pour commander le livre : https://www.pum.umontreal.ca/catalogue/mesure-integree-du-risque-dans-les-organisations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".