MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124501699 · doi:10.20983/epd.2015.25.1

Progressivity and decomposition of VAT in the Mexican border, 2014

2015· article· en· W3124501699 on OpenAlexaff
Luís Huesca Reynoso, Arturo Robles Valencia, Abdelkrim Araar

Bibliographic record

VenueRevistas Cuadernos de Trabajo de Estudios Regionales en Economía Población y Desarrollo · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsEconomicsValue-added taxNoveltyIndirect taxDecompositionPublic economicsMonetary economicsTax reformEconometricsInternational economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measure the general redistributive effect inthe Mexican fiscal system and its northern border with two decomposition approaches.The novelty of thisapplication lies inthe use of non-parametric techniques andthe fact that we did not assumeany functional relationship amongthe variables in analysis.Our papercontributeswith an assessment ofthenew 2014 fiscal reform according to the Value Added Tax (VAT) and its effects on the households.Atax-benefitsystemwith relativeprogressivitybut high HI effectis found as well as an increase on tax revenuesup to4percentof GDPfrom VAT in the border as well. Our analytical method to decompose the total progressivity measured by the contributions of different tax sourcesfrom VAT, allow us to conclude which sort of products should or should not be taxed with the general rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevistas Cuadernos de Trabajo de Estudios Regionales en Economía Población y DesarrolloSame topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207