MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124607885 · doi:10.36835/al-irfan.v3i2.4017

Filsafat Manusia Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Rumusan Pendidikan Islam

2020· article· en· W3124607885 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Irfan Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)IslamPhilosophyHuman beingEpistemologyHuman lifeSociologyHumanitiesTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As it is known that man is the special creature and the best work of God SWT. In this Qur'an called 'ahsan taqwim' It's called the best work of course because there are some privileges and advantages it has. Since hundreds of centuries ago, many philosophers have spoken and experienced human meaning to be able to explain the elements in it so that they can explain where and for what human beings are. Misconception of man will have fatal consequences in destroying something related to him. This study will try to explain the meaning of humans with its various elements from a philosophical point of view by its various streams. Then the link between the human philosophy and education and how Islam destroys the human philosophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it