3-D FDTD Method for Fast Calculation of Geomagnetic Storm Electromagnetic Fields
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a 3-D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is proposed for rigorous modeling and fast calculation of ultralow frequency geomagnetic storm electromagnetic fields (GS-EMFs). The proposed FDTD approach enables modeling of large-scale and complex 3-D earth structure (e.g., multilayer ground and earth curvature). Unlike conventional FDTD methods, the proposed FDTD method does not require extensive computational resources when dealing with ultralow frequency problems. In this article, the ground surface GS-EMFs produced by an electrojet (line current and sheet current sources) are compared with those obtained using the classical 1-D approaches for case of uniform and horizontally stratified ground. The effect of horizontally vertically multilayer ground and earth curvature on the GS-EMFs is evaluated by the proposed FDTD method. The presented results fully support the adequacy and efficiency of the proposed FDTD method for modeling of large-scale and complex 3-D earth structures for calculation of GS-EMFs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it