A leitura e a literatura do século XVIII na configuração de Tristram Shandy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O romance A vida e as opiniões do cavalheiro Tristram Shandy (1760-1767), de Laurence Sterne, apresenta uma configuração híbrida, com uma forma amorfa que flerta com inúmeros gêneros e posições discursivas. Dessas configurações, destacamos a paródia e a ironia, que deixam na obra traços da tradição literária e filosófica, mas também do cenário contemporâneo, que colocam Sterne na posição de representante clássico da história do romance humorístico. Isso em vista, buscamos neste artigo lançar luz sobre alguns dos pontos de diálogo com aspectos históricos que serviram de tema para a composição poética da obra. Destacaremos, também, o diálogo com a realidade leitora e livresca da Inglaterra do século XVIII, tanto de produção de obras literárias, quanto de publicação e apreciação da crítica especializada, embasados por, entre outros, Ian Watt, Roger Chartier, Robert Darnton, e críticos sternianos que abrangem o tema em questão.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".