MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3124633932 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2020-0078

The relationship between morphology changes and antioxidant enzymes activity during somatic embryogenesis of long-term-maintained callus of <i>Zoysia matrella</i> (L.) Merr.

2021· article· en· W3124633932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tianyi Lin, Ren Zhou, Yange Wu, Minxia Gu, Bo Bi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCallusScutellumCatalaseSuperoxide dismutaseBiologyPoint of deliveryRegeneration (biology)BotanyPeroxidaseAntioxidantEmbryoSomatic embryogenesisCell biologyEmbryogenesisEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A callus line of manila grass [Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr.] has been maintained for 8 years in our laboratory. The present study investigated changes in ultrastructure and antioxidant enzyme activity during regeneration of the callus and examined the correlation between these changes and regeneration ability. The changes in fresh weight and diameter of the callus over time could be described by a sigmoidal growth curve with different stages. Electron microscopy revealed small embryonic callus cells, isodiametric in shape, with large, obvious nuclei, and dense cytoplasm. The cellular structures and morphology changed dramatically as regeneration proceeded. Of particular note was the formation of folded scutellum-like embryos at 14 d, which might be the turning point for morphological differentiation. Catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activities were the lowest at 14 d, the same time when superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was highest. Thus, we speculate that the formation of the scutellum-like structures is associated with higher activity of SOD and lower activities of CAT and POD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicPlant tissue culture and regeneration→French-language works237,207→