MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124653913 · doi:10.2979/blackcamera.12.1.04

On Tracking World Cinema: African Cinema at Film Festivals

2020· article· en· W3124653913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diawara

Bibliographic record

VenueBlack Camera · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterFilm industryNational cinemaDistribution (mathematics)State (computer science)IncentiveColonialismMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistorySociologyArt historyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Tracking World Cinema:African Cinema at Film Festivals Manthia Diawara (bio) The Pan-African Federation of Filmmakers (FEPACI) convened during the thirteenth edition of the Pan-African Film Festival of Ouagadougou (FESPACO) to reassess, among other things, the leadership of the filmmakers' association, the role of FESPACO and other festivals in promoting African cinema, and the production and distribution of films. The lack of a public for African cinema in Africa is a complex issue. It is true that the colonization of African screens by American and Kung Fu films is the main reason why African films are not seen in Africa. In fact, this situation is not unique to Africa, as it prevails in European countries, as well as Latin America and Asia, where American films take the larger share of the market, and often relegate national films to art movie theaters. The FEPACI congress recommended quotas and "special tax incentives" to encourage the distribution of African films in Africa. Furthermore, they divided the continent into six sub-regions (East, North, North-West, SouthWest, Central, and Southern), with regional secretaries to oversee distribution activities. The problem with this compartmentalization of the continent in terms of film distribution is that it is utopian in many regards. The nation-state has failed in Africa, and it is increasingly becoming difficult to use it as the basis for organizing an economic unit such as film distribution. Individual countries do not collaborate with a decision that is not favorable to the national interest (i.e., the interest of the ruling party) or to bilateral relations with such Western countries as France and the United States which are opposed to quotas. African cinema exists in exile. Gaston Kabore, the General Secretary of FEPACI, was criticized for traveling too often to Europe and America on behalf of African cinema, and doing little networking in Africa. More African films are seen in Europe and America than in Africa. In fact, an African filmmaker told me that the recent African Film Festival organized in New York was more important to him than FESPACO, because African films have a better market in America than Africa. Yet other filmmakers criticize the [End Page 48] proliferation of African film festivals everywhere in Europe and America, for they do not always have the interest of African cinema as their main goal. FESPACO used to look favorably upon Le festival des trois continents à Nantes, Le Festival d'Amiens, (France), the Milan Festival of African Cinema (Italy), and Vues d'Afrique in Montreal (Canada) as sister festivals. Today, FESPACO considers some of these festivals as threats to its own growth into an annual and international festival. Since the best African films are screened at these European and American festivals, not to mention the ones that get into the Cannes, Venice, Berlin, and London film festivals, filmmakers no longer look to FESPACO for the premiere of their films. These European and American film festivals also contribute to the "ghettoization" of African films, because they only use them for the purposes of multiculturalism as required by their own citizens. The cultural industry around African cinema is growing larger and larger, generating new festivals in every corner of the world, but, from the point of view of the film industry, African cinema is no more important than it was ten or fifteen years ago: there are no production nor distribution structures in place. The realities are those of an auteur cinema with diversified funding sources coming mainly out of Europe. African Cinema in Ouagadougou Ironically, the most ambivalent festival for African film today is FESPACO. Ask any African filmmaker what is the meaning of FESPACO, and he or she will tell you that "FESPACO is our own, Ouagadougou is the home of African cinema, I don't feel marginalized here." It is the only film festival devoted to Pan-African cinema, a festival that takes seriously the task of nurturing, publicizing, and celebrating African films. Ouagadougou is the place to meet filmmakers from other countries, compare notes on films, and exchange information on funding sources. FESPACO is also a home-coming and a family reunion for filmmakers, a chance to meet old friends in the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlack CameraSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207