MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124656275

Stochastic Multi-Product Inventory Models with Limited Storage

2008· article· en· W3124656275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dirk Beyer, Suresh Sethi, R. Sridhar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationProduct (mathematics)Regular polygonConstraint (computer-aided design)Inventory theorySeparable spaceTime horizonInventory controlMathematical economicsComputer scienceEconomicsMathematicsOperations research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies multi-product inventory models with stochastic demands and a warehousing constraint. Finite horizon as well as stationary and nonstationary discounted cost infinite horizon problems are addressed. Existence of optimal feedback policies is established under fairly general assumptions. Furthermore, the structure of optimal policies is analyzed when ordering cost is linear and inventory/backlog cost is convex. The optimal policies generalize the base-stock policies in the single-product case. Finally, in the stationary infinite horizon case, a myopic policy is proved to be optimal if the product demands are independent and cost functions are separable. (MULTIPRODUCT INVENTORY MODEL, WAREHOUSING CONSTRAINT, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING, FINITE AND INFINITE HORIZON, GENERALIZED BASE-STOCK POLICIES, MYOPIC POLICIES) This research was supported by the NSERC grant A4619. The paper has benefited from the comments of the participants in the OM seminar at University of Toronto, where ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207