Sistemas táticos do voleibol Vantagens, desvantagens e suas consequências para a formação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In volleyball the tactical systems within the game show to have a great influence on the results of the matches. The present study seeks to establish the advantages and disadvantages of 4X2 systems with infiltration and 5X1 in the view of coaches to understand what generates the greatest benefit for teams, if there is a preference for a certain system and possible consequences. The qualitative research of exploratory character with 23 national and international coaches had as main results the inherence of the advantages and disadvantages of the tactical systems 4x2 with infiltration and 5x1. It also provided from the results, bringing a range of information that made it possible to relate the massive use of the 5X1 system mainly with the existence of the opposite player and its importance in the power of the attack; the relationship of athletes with a single lifter - rhythm dictator - and the training of athletes still carried out in a traditional way, which results in the early specification of athletes, making it difficult to use systems that are based on the dual role of players.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".